UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-12203

Ingram Micro Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		62-1644402 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1600 E. St. Andrew Place, Santa Ana, California 92705-4926
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(714) 566-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer þ		Accelerated Filer o		Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The Registrant had 156,687,477 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at July 3, 2010.

 

 

INGRAM MICRO INC.

INDEX

			Pages
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010			3
Consolidated Statement of Income for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009			4
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009			5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			6-15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			16-24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			24
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			25-26
Item 1A. Risk Factors			26
Item 5. Other Information			26-27
Item 6. Exhibits			27
Signatures			28
Exhibit Index			29
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

INGRAM MICRO INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

		July 3,				January 2,
		2010				2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	761,849			$	910,936
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $73,423 and $75,018)			3,521,398				3,943,243
Inventory			2,645,951				2,499,895
Other current assets			305,271				392,831
Total current assets			7,234,469				7,746,905
Property and equipment, net			223,534				221,710
Other assets			234,465				210,735
Total assets		$	7,692,468			$	8,179,350
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	3,997,943			$	4,296,224
Accrued expenses			373,972				423,365
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt			96,847				77,071
Total current liabilities			4,468,762				4,796,660
Long-term debt, less current maturities			254,317				302,424
Other liabilities			65,827				68,453
Total liabilities			4,788,906				5,167,537
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding			—				—
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 180,517,421 and 179,478,329 shares issued and 156,687,477 and 164,383,422 shares outstanding at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively			1,805				1,795
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 135,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding			—				—
Additional paid-in capital			1,218,392				1,201,577
Treasury stock, 23,829,944 and 15,094,907 shares at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively			(391,069	)			(243,219	)
Retained earnings			2,020,750				1,882,695
Accumulated other comprehensive income			53,684				168,965
Total stockholders’ equity			2,903,562				3,011,813
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	7,692,468			$	8,179,350

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,				July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Net sales		$	8,156,328			$	6,578,598			$	16,252,282			$	13,323,682
Cost of sales			7,718,875				6,192,493				15,373,367				12,556,573
Gross profit			437,453				386,105				878,915				767,109
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative			333,066				336,288				669,008				658,260
Impairment of goodwill			—				2,490				—				2,490
Reorganization costs (credits)			(189	)			6,334				(358	)			20,120
			332,877				345,112				668,650				680,870
Income from operations			104,576				40,993				210,265				86,239
Other expense (income):
Interest income			(885	)			(2,014	)			(2,113	)			(4,680	)
Interest expense			7,319				6,085				13,469				13,035
Net foreign currency exchange loss			1,178				1,916				1,677				3,634
Other			2,241				758				5,277				2,377
			9,853				6,745				18,310				14,366
Income before income taxes			94,723				34,248				191,955				71,873
Provision for income taxes			26,996				8,904				53,900				19,063
Net income		$	67,727			$	25,344			$	138,055			$	52,810
Basic earnings per share		$	0.42			$	0.16			$	0.84			$	0.33
Diluted earnings per share		$	0.41			$	0.15			$	0.83			$	0.32

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in 000s)
(Unaudited)

		Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	138,055			$	52,810
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			32,034				33,145
Impairment of goodwill			—				2,490
Stock-based compensation			11,065				7,858
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation			(1,614	)			(2,360	)
Gain on sale of land and building			(2,380	)			—
Noncash charges for interest			242				173
Deferred income taxes			7,928				503
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable			292,803				346,725
Inventory			(236,933	)			455,424
Other current assets			38,144				65,945
Accounts payable			(149,109	)			(106,948	)
Change in book overdrafts			(18,044	)			(73,234	)
Accrued expenses			(21,143	)			(81,937	)
Cash provided by operating activities			91,048				700,594
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment			(34,702	)			(36,687	)
Net sales of marketable trading securities			699				416
Collection of short-term collateral deposits on financing arrangements			—				3,270
Proceeds from sale of land and building			3,924				—
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired			(4,933	)			(18,458	)
Cash used by investing activities			(35,012	)			(51,459	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options			12,654				19,623
Repurchase of Class A Common Stock			(152,285	)			—
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation			1,614				2,360
Repayment of senior unsecured term loan			(6,250	)			—
Net repayments of other debt			(23,654	)			(135,930	)
Cash used by financing activities			(167,921	)			(113,947	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			(37,202	)			17,088
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			(149,087	)			552,276
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			910,936				763,495
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	761,849			$	1,315,771

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation

     Ingram Micro Inc. and its subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the distribution of information technology (“IT”) products and supply chain solutions worldwide. Ingram Micro Inc. and its subsidiaries operate in North America, Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), Asia Pacific and Latin America.

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ingram Micro Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms “Ingram Micro,” “we,” “us” and “our” in these notes to the consolidated financial statements refers to Ingram Micro Inc. and its subsidiaries. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments (consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state our consolidated financial position as of July 3, 2010, our consolidated results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, and consolidated cash flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. As permitted under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, these consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures and footnotes normally included with annual consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended January 2, 2010. The consolidated results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 may not be indicative of the consolidated results of operations that can be expected for the full year.

     Book Overdrafts

     Book overdrafts of $393,900 and $411,944 as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively, represent checks issued that had not been presented for payment to the banks and are classified as accounts payable in our consolidated balance sheet. We typically fund these overdrafts through normal collections of funds or transfers from other bank balances. Under the terms of our facilities with the banks, the respective financial institutions are not legally obligated to honor the book overdraft balances as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, or any balance on any given date.

Note 2 – Share Repurchases

     During the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010, we completed our $300,000 share repurchase program authorized in November 2007 with the purchase of 3,038,000 shares of common stock for $52,285. In May 2010, our Board of Directors authorized an additional one-year $100,000 share repurchase program. This share repurchase program was completed in June 2010 with the repurchase of 5,922,000 shares of common stock for $100,000. The repurchases were funded with cash and available borrowing capacity.

     We account for repurchased shares of common stock as treasury stock. Treasury shares are recorded at cost and are included as a component of stockholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheet. Our stock repurchases activity for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 are summarized in the table below. We have also issued shares of common stock out of our cumulative balance of treasury shares, as summarized in the table below for the

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009. Such shares are issued to certain of our associates for the vesting of their restricted stock units under the Ingram Micro Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (see Note 4).

						Weighted
		Shares				Average
		(in 000s)				Price Per Share				Amount
Cumulative balance at January 2, 2010			15,095			$	16.11			$	243,219
Repurchased shares of common stock			8,960				16.99				152,285
Issued shares of common stock			(225	)			19.67				(4,435	)
Cumulative balance at July 3, 2010			23,830				16.41			$	391,069
Cumulative balance at January 3, 2009			15,252			$	16.15			$	246,314
Issued shares of common stock			(37	)			19.67				(725	)
Cumulative balance at July 4, 2009			15,215				16.14			$	245,589

Note 3 – Earnings Per Share

     We report a dual presentation of Basic Earnings per Share (“Basic EPS”) and Diluted Earnings per Share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock awards and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised, using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method, where applicable.

     The computation of Basic EPS and Diluted EPS is as follows:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,				July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Net income		$	67,727			$	25,344			$	138,055			$	52,810
Weighted average shares (in 000s)			162,325				162,353				163,747				162,006
Basic EPS		$	0.42			$	0.16			$	0.84			$	0.33
Weighted average shares (in 000s), including the dilutive effect of stock-based awards (3,112 and 2,535 for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, and 3,322 and 1,531 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively)			165,437				164,888				167,069				163,537
Diluted EPS		$	0.41			$	0.15			$	0.83			$	0.32

     There were approximately 5,589,000 and 8,833,000 stock-based awards for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, and 5,562,000 and 12,485,000 stock-based awards for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, that were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Class A Common Stock during the respective periods, thereby resulting in an antidilutive effect.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 4 – Stock-Based Compensation

     We currently have a single equity-based incentive plan approved by our stockholders, the Ingram Micro Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”), for the granting of equity-based incentive awards including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights, among others, to key employees and members of our Board of Directors. Under the 2003 Plan, the existing authorized pool of shares available for grant is a fungible pool, where the authorized share limit is reduced by one share for every share subject to a stock option or stock appreciation right granted and 1.9 shares for every share granted under any award other than an option or stock appreciation right. We have granted restricted stock and restricted stock units, in addition to stock options, to key employees and members of our Board of Directors. Options granted to employees vest over a period of three years; those to members of our Board of Directors over ten months to one year; and all options have expiration dates not longer than 10 years. A portion of the restricted stock and restricted stock units vests over time periods from 10 months to three years. The remainder of the restricted stock and restricted stock units vests upon achievement of certain performance measures over a time period of one to three years. In 2010, a portion of the performance-vested restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants to management are based on profit before tax, with the remainder based on earnings per share growth and return on invested capital. In 2009, a portion of the performance-vested restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants to management were based on profit before tax, with the remainder based on economic profit. Prior to 2009, the performance-vested restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants were based on earnings per share growth and return on invested capital.

     No stock options were granted during the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 or July 4, 2009, while restricted stock and restricted stock units granted were 80,000 and 387,000, respectively. Stock options granted during the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 were 48,000 and 141,000, respectively, and restricted stock and restricted stock units granted were 1,802,000 and 3,401,000, respectively. As of July 3, 2010, approximately 3,901,000 shares were available for grant under the 2003 Plan, taking into account granted options, time vested restricted stock units/awards and performance vested restricted stock units assuming maximum achievement. Stock-based compensation expense for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 was $7,034 and $6,312, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was approximately $2,134 and $1,600, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 was $11,065 and $7,858, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was approximately $3,480 and $2,100, respectively.

     During the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, a total of 240,000 and 1,144,000 stock options, respectively, were exercised, and 42,000 and 24,000 restricted stock and restricted stock units vested, respectively. For the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, a total of 801,000 and 1,669,000 stock options, respectively, were exercised, and 732,000 and 57,000 restricted stock and restricted stock units vested, respectively. In addition, during the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, the Board of Directors determined that the performance measures for certain performance-based grants were not met, resulting in the cancellation of approximately 492,000 and 394,000 shares, respectively.

Note 5 – Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,				July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Net income		$	67,727			$	25,344			$	138,055			$	52,810
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments and other			(76,955	)			67,952				(115,281	)			33,869
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	(9,228	)		$	93,296			$	22,774			$	86,679

     Accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity totaled $53,684 and $168,965 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively, and consisted primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments and fair value adjustments to our interest rate swap agreement and foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Derivative Financial Instruments

     The notional amounts and fair values of derivative instruments in our consolidated balance sheet were as follows:

		Notional Amounts (1)								Fair Value
		July 3,				January 2,				July 3,				January 2,
		2010				2010				2010				2010
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments recorded in:
Other current assets
Foreign exchange contracts		$	5,612			$	—			$	670			$	—
Accrued expenses
Foreign exchange contracts			80,791				426,707				(714	)			(6,484	)
Long-term debt
Interest rate contracts			190,625				196,875				(10,706	)			(9,662	)
			277,028				623,582				(10,750	)			(16,146	)
Derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment recorded in:
Other current assets
Foreign exchange contracts			297,285				198,634				5,696				1,678
Accrued expenses
Foreign exchange contracts			653,263				951,782				(4,784	)			(12,566	)
			950,548				1,150,416				912				(10,888	)
Total		$	1,227,576			$	1,773,998			$	(9,838	)		$	(27,034	)

     The amount recognized in earnings on our derivative instruments, including ineffectiveness, was a net gain (loss) of $41,397 and $(32,528) for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, a net gain (loss) of $53,422 and $(39,622), respectively, for the twenty-six weeks July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, which was largely offset by the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities. The gains or losses on derivative instruments are classified in our consolidated statement of income on a consistent basis with the classification of the change in fair value of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities. Unrealized losses of $353 and $144, net of taxes, during the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, and $637 and $3,648, net of taxes, during the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, were reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheet for losses associated with our cash flow hedging transactions.

     Cash Flow and Other Hedges

     We have designated hedges consisting of an interest rate swap to hedge variable interest rates on a portion of the senior unsecured term loan, a cross-currency interest rate swap to hedge foreign currency denominated principal and interest payments related to intercompany loans, and foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain anticipated foreign currency denominated intercompany management fees. In addition, we also use foreign currency forward contracts that are not designated as hedges primarily to manage currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and intercompany loans.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements

     Our assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: Level 1- quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 — observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and Level 3 — unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

     At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included: cash equivalents, consisting primarily of money market accounts of $484,237 and $168,157, respectively, and marketable trading securities (included in other currents assets in our consolidated balance sheet) of $38,113 and $40,230, respectively, determined based on Level 1 criteria, as defined above; and derivative assets of $6,366 and $1,678, respectively, and derivative liabilities of $16,204 and $28,712, respectively, determined based on Level 2 criteria. The change in the fair value of derivative instruments was a net unrealized gain of $10,331 and $17,196 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010, respectively, and a net unrealized loss of $4,967 and $3,509 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009, respectively. The fair value of the cash equivalents approximated cost and the gain or loss on the marketable trading securities was recognized in the consolidated statement of income to reflect these investments at fair value.

Note 8 – Acquisitions and Intangible Assets

     In the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Albora Soluciones in our EMEA region and the assets and liabilities of Asiasoft Hong Kong Limited in our Asia Pacific region. These acquisitions further strengthen our capabilities in virtualization, security and middleware solutions and enterprise computing. These entities were acquired for an aggregate cash price of $4,933, which has been preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the transaction dates, resulting in identifiable intangible assets of $2,921, primarily related to vendor and customer relationships with estimated useful lives of 10 years and deferred tax liabilities of $779 related to the intangible assets, none of which are deductible for income tax purposes.

     In the second quarter of 2009, we acquired the assets and liabilities of Value Added Distributors Limited and Vantex Technology Distribution Limited in our Asia Pacific region, which strengthened our capabilities in the high-end enterprise and automatic identification and data capture/point of sale (“AIDC/POS”) solutions markets, respectively. These entities were acquired for an aggregate cash price of $15,724 plus an estimated earn-out amount of $935, which have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the transaction dates, resulting in goodwill of $2,490 and identifiable intangible assets of $6,364, primarily related to vendor and customer relationships, and tradenames with estimated useful lives of 10 years. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment of all of our goodwill as a result of the drastic decline in capital markets and the economy as a whole and the resulting impact on our valuation of our regional reporting units. Due to the continued weak demand for technology products and services in Asia Pacific and globally in 2009, our Asia Pacific reporting unit fair value remained below the carrying value of our assets. As such, we recorded a full impairment charge for the recorded goodwill from these two acquisitions in the second quarter of 2009.

     In 2009, we paid the sellers of AVAD $2,500 to settle the previously accrued earn-out of $1,000 at January 3, 2009 and the balance to obtain certain trademark rights, which have been included in our identifiable intangible assets with estimated useful lives of 10 years.

     All acquisitions for the periods presented above were not material, individually or in the aggregate, to us as a whole and therefore, pro-forma financial information has not been presented.

     The gross carrying amounts of finite-lived identifiable intangible assets of $173,737 and $172,363 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively, are amortized over their remaining estimated lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The net carrying amount was $85,018 and $92,054 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense was $4,303 and $4,069 for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively, and $8,646 and $7,969 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively. The net identifiable intangible assets are reflected in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Reorganization and Expense-Reduction Program Costs

     In the second half of 2008 and through 2009, we implemented actions in all of our regions to align our level of operating expenses with declines in sales volume. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009, we incurred a net charge of $6,334 and $20,120, respectively, recorded in reorganization costs, and other costs associated with these actions totaling $1,019 and $1,457, respectively, recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A expenses”). Aggregate net charges by region in the respective thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 4, 2009 were $5,275 and $11,470 in North America, $1,493 and $7,605 in EMEA, $531 and $2,266 in Asia Pacific, and $54 and $236 in Latin America.

     The remaining liabilities and payment activities associated with our 2009 actions are summarized in the table below for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010:

		Outstanding				Amounts Paid								Remaining
		Liability at				and Charged								Liability at
		January 2,				Against the								July 3,
		2010				Liability				Adjustments				2010
Employee termination benefits		$	1,499			$	(1,433	)		$	(48	)		$	18
Facility costs			10,538				(1,610	)			(315	)			8,613
Other costs			581				(283	)			(187	)			111
		$	12,618			$	(3,326	)		$	(550	)		$	8,742

     Adjustments reflected in the table above include a reduction to reorganization liabilities of $347, consisting of $146 in North America for lower than expected costs associated with employee termination benefits and facility consolidations, $167 in EMEA for lower than expected costs associated with employee termination benefits and facility consolidations and $34 in Asia Pacific for lower than expected costs associated with employee termination benefits. Adjustments also include the net foreign currency impact of weakening foreign currencies, which decreased the U.S. dollar liability by $203. We expect the remaining liabilities for the employee termination benefits to be substantially utilized by the end of the third quarter of 2010, while the remaining liabilities associated with facility and other costs are expected to be substantially utilized by the end of 2014.

     The remaining liabilities and payment activities associated with the actions taken during 2008 to rationalize certain roles and processes in North America, EMEA and Asia Pacific are summarized in the table below for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010:

		Outstanding				Amounts Paid								Remaining
		Liability at				and Charged								Liability at
		January 2,				Against the								July 3,
		2010				Liability				Adjustments				2010
Employee termination benefits		$	218			$	(175	)		$	(17	)		$	26
Facility costs			1,111				(532	)			(118	)			461
Other costs			25				(25	)			—				—
		$	1,354			$	(732	)		$	(135	)		$	487

     Adjustments reflected in the table above include a reduction to reorganization liabilities of $11 in EMEA related to lower than expected costs associated with employee termination benefits, and a net foreign currency impact that decreased the U.S. dollar liability by $124. We expect the remaining liabilities for the employee termination benefits to be substantially utilized by the end of the third quarter of 2010, while the remaining liabilities associated with facility costs are expected to be substantially utilized by the end of 2011.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

     Prior to 2006, we launched other outsourcing and optimization plans to improve operating efficiencies and to integrate past acquisitions. The remaining liabilities and payment activities associated with these actions are summarized in the table below for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010:

		Outstanding				Amounts Paid								Remaining
		Liability at				and Charged								Liability at
		January 2,				Against the								July 3,
		2010				Liability				Adjustments				2010
Facility costs		$	5,087			$	(365	)		$	205			$	4,927

     Adjustments in the table above reflect a foreign currency impact that increased the U.S. dollar liability by $205. We expect the remaining liability for facility costs to be fully utilized by the end of 2015.

Note 10 – Debt

     The carrying value of outstanding debt at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 were as follows:

		July 3,				January 2,
		2010				2010
Asia Pacific revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program		$	15,487			$	57,526
Senior unsecured term loan			251,331				256,537
Revolving unsecured credit facilities			—				861
Lines of credit and other debt			84,346				64,571
			351,164				379,495
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt			(96,847	)			(77,071	)
		$	254,317			$	302,424

     In April 2010, we terminated our revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in North America, which provided for up to $600,000 in borrowing capacity secured by substantially all U.S.-based receivables, in conjunction with the execution in the same month of a new revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program secured by a majority of our U.S.-based receivables. This new program initially provides for up to $500,000 in borrowing capacity, and may, subject to the financial institutions’ approval and availability of eligible receivables, be increased to $700,000 in accordance with the terms of the program. The interest rate of this new program is dependent on designated commercial paper rates (or, in certain circumstances, an alternate rate) plus a predetermined margin. The new program matures in April 2013. We had no borrowings at July 3, 2010 under this new North America financing program and we had no borrowings under the terminated facility at January 2, 2010.

     In January 2010, we entered into a new revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in EMEA, which provides for a borrowing capacity of up to Euro 100 million, or approximately $126,000 at July 3, 2010, and matures in January 2014. This new program replaced our Euro 107 million revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program, which we terminated in December 2009. The new program requires certain commitment fees, and borrowings under this program incur financing costs based on EURIBOR plus a predetermined margin. We had no borrowings at July 3, 2010 under this new EMEA financing program.

     We also had a revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in EMEA, which provided for borrowing capacity of up to Euro 70 million which matured in April 2010 and was not renewed or directly replaced. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facility at January 2, 2010.

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Note 11 – Income Taxes

     At July 3, 2010, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $20,521 compared to $21,254 at January 2, 2010, representing a net decrease of $733 during the first half of 2010. Substantially all of the gross unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate in the period of recognition. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. In addition to the gross unrecognized tax benefits identified above, the interest and penalties recorded to date by us totaled $1,988 and $1,621 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively.

     We conduct business globally and, as a result, we and/or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions and in over thirty foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate. In the U.S., we concluded our IRS federal income tax audit for tax years 2004 and 2005 during the third quarter of 2009, effectively closing all years to IRS audit up through 2005. The IRS initiated an examination of tax years 2007 to 2009 during the current quarter. In addition, a number of state, local and foreign exams are ongoing. While we do not anticipate our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly within the next twelve months, it is possible within that period that one or more of our ongoing tax examinations may be resolved, that new tax examinations may commence, and that other issues may be effectively settled.

Note 12 – Segment Information

     We operate predominantly in a single industry segment as a distributor of IT products and supply chain solutions. Our operating segments are based on geographic location, and the measure of segment profit is income from operations. We do not allocate stock-based compensation recognized (see Note 4) to our operating units; therefore, we are reporting this as a separate amount.

     Geographic areas in which we operate currently include North America (United States and Canada), EMEA (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom), Asia Pacific (Australia, the People’s Republic of China including Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Thailand), and Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, and our Latin American export operations in Miami).

     Financial information by geographic segment is as follows:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,				July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Net sales:
North America		$	3,558,789			$	2,743,815			$	6,850,775			$	5,516,621
EMEA			2,371,505				2,011,605				5,036,915				4,277,774
Asia Pacific			1,866,141				1,501,178				3,634,540				2,885,824
Latin America			359,893				322,000				730,052				643,463
Total		$	8,156,328			$	6,578,598			$	16,252,282			$	13,323,682

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3,				July 4,				July 3,				July 4,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Income from operations:
North America		$	54,708			$	9,121			$	96,624			$	21,912
EMEA			22,290				10,228				57,151				25,346
Asia Pacific			29,787				22,794				56,314				36,624
Latin America			4,825				5,162				11,241				10,215
Stock-based compensation expense			(7,034	)			(6,312	)			(11,065	)			(7,858	)
Total		$	104,576			$	40,993			$	210,265			$	86,239
Capital expenditures:
North America		$	14,136			$	12,089			$	26,758			$	31,221
EMEA			1,511				2,337				2,468				3,255
Asia Pacific			2,204				938				3,131				1,927
Latin America			542				97				2,345				284
Total		$	18,393			$	15,461			$	34,702			$	36,687
Depreciation and amortization:
North America		$	9,096			$	9,514			$	17,849			$	18,134
EMEA			3,055				3,980				6,352				7,590
Asia Pacific			3,247				3,226				6,563				6,250
Latin America			672				580				1,270				1,171
Total		$	16,070			$	17,300			$	32,034			$	33,145

		As of
		July 3,				January 2,
		2010				2010
Identifiable assets:
North America		$	3,368,702			$	3,586,238
EMEA			2,418,891				2,753,847
Asia Pacific			1,543,033				1,373,553
Latin America			361,842				465,712
Total		$	7,692,468			$	8,179,350

Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

     Our Brazilian subsidiary has been assessed for commercial taxes on its purchases of imported software for the period January to September 2002. The principal amount of the tax assessed for this period was 12.7 million Brazilian reais. Although we believe we have valid defenses to the payment of the assessed taxes, as well as any amounts due for the unassessed period from October 2002 to December 2005, after consultation with counsel and consideration of legislation enacted in February 2007, it is our opinion that it is probable that we may be required to pay all or some of these taxes. Accordingly, we recorded a net charge to cost of sales of $30,134 in 2007 to establish a liability for these taxes assessable through December 2005. The legislation enacted in February 2007 provides that such taxes are not assessable on software imports after January 1, 2006. In the fourth quarters of 2009 and 2008, we released a portion of this commercial tax reserve amounting to $9,758 and $8,224, respectively, (17.1 million and 19.6 million Brazilian reais at a December 2009 exchange rate of 1.741 and December 2008 exchange rate of 2.330 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar, respectively). These partial reserve releases were related to the unassessed periods from January through December 2004 and January through December 2003, respectively, for which it is our opinion, after consultation with counsel, that the statute of limitations for an assessment from Brazilian tax authorities has expired. The remaining amount of liability at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 was 28.2 million Brazilian reais (approximately $15,800 and $16,200 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively, based on the exchange rate prevailing on those dates of 1.779 and 1.741 Brazilian reais, respectively, to the U.S. dollar).

INGRAM MICRO INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

     While the tax authorities may seek to impose interest and penalties in addition to the tax as discussed above, we continue to believe that we have valid defenses to the assessment of interest and penalties, which as of July 3, 2010 potentially amount to approximately $13,500 and $11,900, respectively, based on the exchange rate prevailing on that date of 1.779 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar. Therefore, we have not established an additional reserve for interest and penalties as we have determined that an unfavorable outcome with respect to interest and penalties is currently not probable. We will continue to vigorously pursue administrative and judicial action to challenge the current, and any subsequent assessments. However, we can make no assurances that we will ultimately be successful in defending any such assessments, if made.

     In 2007, the Sao Paulo Municipal Tax Authorities assessed our Brazilian subsidiary a commercial service tax based upon our sale of software. The assessment for taxes and penalties covers the years 2002 through 2006 and totaled 55.1 million Brazilian reais or approximately $31,000 based upon a July 3, 2010 exchange rate of 1.779 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar. Although not included in the original assessment, additional potential liability arising from this assessment for interest and adjustment for inflation totaled 75.8 million Brazilian reais or approximately $42,600 at July 3, 2010. The authorities could make further tax assessments for the period after 2006, which may be material. It is our opinion, after consulting with counsel, that our subsidiary has valid defenses against the assessment of these taxes, penalties, interest, or any additional assessments related to this matter, and we therefore have not recorded a charge for the assessment as an unfavorable outcome is not probable. After seeking relief in administrative proceedings, we are now vigorously pursuing judicial action to challenge the current assessment and any subsequent assessments, which may require us to post collateral or provide a guarantee equal to or greater than the total amount of the assessment, penalties and interest, adjusted for inflation factors. In addition, we can make no assurances that we will ultimately be successful in our defense of this matter.

     There are other various claims, lawsuits and pending actions against us incidental to our operations. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, we can make no assurances that we will ultimately be successful in our defense of any of these matters.

     As is customary in the IT distribution industry, we have arrangements with certain finance companies that provide inventory-financing facilities for our customers. In conjunction with certain of these arrangements, we have agreements with the finance companies that would require us to repurchase certain inventory, which might be repossessed from the customers by the finance companies. For various reasons, including the lack of information regarding the amount of saleable inventory purchased from us still on hand with the customer at any point in time, repurchase obligations relating to inventory cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by us under these arrangements have been insignificant to date.

Note 14 – New Accounting Standards

     In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new accounting standard related to revenue recognition in multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and certain arrangements that include software elements. This standard eliminates the residual method of revenue allocation by requiring entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on selling price hierarchy. The FASB also issued a new accounting standard in October 2009, which changes revenue recognition for tangible products containing software and hardware elements. Under this standard, tangible products containing software and hardware that function together to deliver the tangible products’ essential functionality are scoped out of the existing software revenue recognition guidance and will be accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance discussed above. Both standards will be effective for us beginning January 2, 2011 (the first day of fiscal 2011). Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

     In January 2010, the FASB issued a guidance which amends and clarifies existing guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures. This guidance requires new disclosures for (1) transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 categories and the reasons for such transfers; and (2) the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlement in the Level 3 reconciliation. It also clarifies guidance around disaggregation and disclosures of inputs and valuation techniques for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this guidance effective the first quarter of fiscal 2010, except for the new disclosures in the Level 3 reconciliation. The Level 3 disclosure requirement is effective for us beginning January 2, 2011 (the first day of fiscal 2011), which is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations or related disclosures.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     Unless otherwise stated, all currency amounts, other than per share information, contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations are stated in thousands of U.S. dollars.

     The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, management’s expectations of competition, revenues, margin, expenses and other operating results and ratios; operating efficiencies; economic conditions; cost-savings; capital expenditures; liquidity; capital requirements; acquisitions and integration costs; operating models; exchange rate fluctuations; and rates of return. In evaluating our business, readers should carefully consider the important factors included in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements.

Overview of Our Business

     We are the largest wholesale distributor of information technology, or IT, products and supply chain solutions worldwide based on revenues. We offer a broad range of IT products and supply chain solutions and help generate demand and create efficiencies for our customers and suppliers around the world. Our results of operations have been, and will continue to be, directly affected by the conditions in the economy in general. The IT distribution industry in which we operate is characterized by narrow gross profit as a percentage of net sales, or gross margin, and narrow income from operations as a percentage of net sales, or operating margin. Historically, our margins have also been impacted by pressures from price competition and declining average selling prices, as well as changes in vendor terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, variations in vendor rebates and incentives, our ability to return inventory to vendors, and time periods qualifying for price protection. We expect competitive pricing pressures and restrictive vendor terms and conditions to continue in the foreseeable future. To mitigate these factors, we have implemented changes to and continue to refine our pricing strategies, inventory management processes and vendor program processes. In addition, we continuously monitor and change, as appropriate, certain terms, conditions and credit offered to our customers to reflect those being imposed by our vendors, recover costs and/or facilitate sales opportunities. We have also strived to improve our profitability through our diversification of product offerings, including our presence in adjacent product categories, such as automatic identification/data capture and point-of-sale, or AIDC/POS, enterprise computing, consumer electronics and fee-for-service logistics offerings. Our business also requires significant levels of working capital primarily to finance trade accounts receivable and inventory. We have historically relied on, and continue to rely heavily on, trade credit from vendors, available cash and debt for our working capital needs.

     We have complemented our internal growth initiatives with strategic business acquisitions. We have expanded our value-added distribution of mobile data and AIDC/POS solutions over the past few years through acquisitions of the distribution businesses of Eurequat SA, Intertrade A.F. AG, Paradigm Distribution Ltd. and Symtech Nordic AS in EMEA, and Vantex Technology Distribution Limited, or Vantex, and the Cantechs Group in Asia Pacific. We have also expanded our presence in the mid-range enterprise market through the recent acquisitions of Computacenter Distribution, or CCD, and Albora Soluciones, or Albora, in EMEA and Value Added Distributors Limited, or VAD, and Asiasoft Hong Kong Limited, or Asiasoft, in Asia Pacific.

Results of Operations

     The following tables set forth our net sales by geographic region (excluding intercompany sales) and the percentage of total net sales represented thereby, as well as operating income and operating margin by geographic region for each of the thirteen and twenty-six-week periods indicated.

		Thirteen Weeks Ended																Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3, 2010								July 4, 2009								July 3, 2010								July 4, 2009
Net sales by geographic region:
North America		$	3,558,789				43.6	%		$	2,743,815				41.7	%		$	6,850,775				42.1	%		$	5,516,621				41.4	%
EMEA			2,371,505				29.1				2,011,605				30.6				5,036,915				31.0				4,277,774				32.1
Asia Pacific			1,866,141				22.9				1,501,178				22.8				3,634,540				22.4				2,885,824				21.7
Latin America			359,893				4.4				322,000				4.9				730,052				4.5				643,463				4.8
Total		$	8,156,328				100.0	%		$	6,578,598				100.0	%		$	16,252,282				100.0	%		$	13,323,682				100.0	%

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

		Thirteen Weeks Ended																Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3, 2010								July 4, 2009								July 3, 2010								July 4, 2009
Operating income and operating margin by geographic region:
North America		$	54,708				1.54	%		$	9,121				0.33	%		$	96,624				1.41	%		$	21,912				0.40	%
EMEA			22,290				0.94				10,228				0.51				57,151				1.13				25,346				0.59
Asia Pacific			29,787				1.60				22,794				1.52				56,314				1.55				36,624				1.27
Latin America			4,825				1.34				5,162				1.60				11,241				1.54				10,215				1.59
Stock-based compensation expense			(7,034	)			—				(6,312	)			—				(11,065	)			—				(7,858	)			—
Total		$	104,576				1.28	%		$	40,993				0.62	%		$	210,265				1.29	%		$	86,239				0.65	%

     Our income from operations for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 includes $2,380 from the gain on the sale of land and a building in EMEA. Our income from operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 included net charges of $7,353 and $21,577, respectively, comprised of $5,275 and $11,470, respectively, of net charges in North America, $1,493 and $7,605, respectively, of net charges in EMEA, $531 and $2,266, respectively, of charges in Asia Pacific and $54 and $236, respectively, of charges in Latin America related to our reorganization and expense-reduction programs (see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements). In addition, the thirteen and twenty-six-week periods ended July 4, 2009 include a goodwill impairment charge of $2,490 in Asia Pacific as discussed in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.

     We sell finished products purchased from many vendors but generated approximately 24% of our consolidated net sales for both of the twenty-six week periods ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 from products purchased from Hewlett-Packard Company and 10% for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 from products purchased from Cisco Systems, Inc. There were no other vendors or any customers that represented 10% or more of our consolidated net sales in either of the periods presented.

     The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statement of income as a percentage of net sales, for each of the periods indicated (percentages below may not total due to rounding).

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-six Weeks Ended
		July 3, 2010				July 4, 2009				July 3, 2010				July 4, 2009
Net sales			100.00	%			100.00	%			100.00	%			100.00	%
Cost of sales			94.64				94.13				94.59				94.24
Gross profit			5.36				5.87				5.41				5.76
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative			4.08				5.11				4.12				4.94
Impairment of goodwill			—				0.04				—				0.02
Reorganization costs (credits)			(0.00	)			0.10				(0.00	)			0.15
Income from operations			1.28				0.62				1.29				0.65
Other expense, net			0.12				0.10				0.11				0.11
Income before income taxes			1.16				0.52				1.18				0.54
Provision for income taxes			0.33				0.13				0.33				0.14
Net income			0.83	%			0.39	%			0.85	%			0.40	%

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

Results of Operations for the Thirteen Weeks Ended July 3, 2010 Compared to the Thirteen Weeks Ended July 4, 2009

     Our consolidated net sales increased 24.0% to $8,156,328 for the thirteen weeks ended July 3, 2010, or second quarter of 2010, from $6,578,598 for the thirteen weeks ended July 4, 2009, or second quarter of 2009. Net sales from our North American operations increased 29.7% to $3,558,789 in the second quarter of 2010 from $2,743,815 in the second quarter of 2009. Net sales from our EMEA operations increased 17.9% to $2,371,505 in the second quarter of 2010 from $2,011,605 in the second quarter of 2009. Net sales from our Asia Pacific operations increased 24.3% to $1,866,141 in the second quarter of 2010 from $1,501,178 in the second quarter of 2009. Net sales from our Latin American operations increased 11.8% to $359,893 in the second quarter of 2010 from $322,000 in the second quarter of 2009. The significant year-over-year increase in our consolidated net sales, as well as our regional net sales, was primarily due to the overall improvement in demand for technology products and services in substantially all of our operating units worldwide. The translation impact of strengthening Asia Pacific and Latin American currencies relative to the U.S. dollar contributed approximately seven and six percentage points of the year-over-year increase in the respective region’s net sales, while the translation impact of relatively weaker European currencies had a negative effect on EMEA’s net sales of approximately seven percentage points. The combined translation impacts of these foreign currencies essentially offset and were therefore not material to our consolidated net sales. Our acquisition of CCD contributed approximately two percentage points of growth in EMEA and our acquisitions of VAD and Vantex contributed approximately one percentage point of growth in Asia Pacific. These acquisitions combined to contribute approximately one percentage point of growth to consolidated net sales. Our disposition of certain of our Nordic operations during 2009 resulted in a reduction in our EMEA net sales by approximately two percentage points and a reduction of consolidated net sales by one percentage point.

     Gross margin declined 51 basis points to 5.36% in the second quarter of 2010 from 5.87% in the second quarter of 2009, which was a 10-year high for a second quarter. The drop year-over-year is driven primarily by our strategic decision to use gross margin as one component of our efforts to drive sales growth and thereby generate higher operating leverage, as well as a greater mix of lower-margin products and softer volumes in our fee-for-service logistics business. We continuously evaluate and modify our pricing policies and certain terms, conditions and credit offered to our customers on a transaction-by-transaction basis to reflect general market conditions, available vendor support and strategic opportunities to grow market share and to optimize our profitability and return on capital. These modifications may result in some volatility in our gross margin, but we continue to manage our margin profile and the various factors therein. Increased competition or any retraction from the early economic recovery or softness in economies throughout the world may hinder our ability to maintain and/or improve gross margins from the levels realized in recent periods.

     Total selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A expenses, decreased 1.0% to $333,066 in the second quarter of 2010 from $336,288 in the second quarter of 2009 and decreased 103 basis points, as percentage of consolidated net sales, to 4.08% in the second quarter of 2010 from 5.11% in the second quarter of 2009. The significant year-over-year improvement was primarily attributable to the savings from our expense-reduction initiatives implemented since the second half of 2008 and savings of approximately $3,000 from our exit of the broad line distribution business in EMEA’s Nordic region during the second quarter of 2009, partially offset by incremental variable costs on the higher sales volume and additional expenses of approximately $2,000 resulting from our acquired businesses. The translation impacts of foreign currencies were not material to the year-over-year comparison of our SG&A expenses. We estimate that our expense reduction initiatives yielded reductions in annualized operating expenses of $130,000 when compared to our first quarter of 2008 run rate, and that we had achieved approximately half of these savings by the second quarter of 2009, and the full run rate entering 2010.

     In the second quarter of 2009, we incurred reorganization costs of $6,334, or 10 basis points of consolidated net sales, associated with various actions we were taking as part of our cost reduction initiatives in each of our regions as follows: $4,456 or 16 basis points of regional net sales in North America, $1,293 or six basis points of regional net sales in EMEA, $531 or four basis points of regional net sales in Asia Pacific, and $54 or two basis points of regional net sales in Latin America. In connection with these actions, we also incurred $1,019, or two basis points of consolidated net sales, ($819 or three basis points of regional net sales in North America, and $200 or one basis point of regional net sales in EMEA) in program costs such as retention costs and consulting expenses, which are recorded in SG&A expenses (see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements).

     As further discussed in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements, we recorded a charge of $2,490 or four basis points of consolidated net sales (17 basis points of Asia Pacific net sales), during the second quarter of 2009 for the impairment of goodwill related to our small but strategic acquisitions of VAD and Vantex in Asia Pacific.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

     Operating margin increased to 1.28% in the second quarter of 2010 from 0.62% in the second quarter of 2009. Our second quarter of 2009 operating margin included reorganization and program costs of 11 basis points of consolidated net sales, as well as a goodwill impairment charge of four basis points of consolidated net sales. Our North American operating margin increased to 1.54% in the second quarter of 2010 from 0.33% in the second quarter of 2009. Our EMEA operating margin increased to 0.94% in the second quarter of 2010 from 0.51% in the second quarter of 2009. Our Asia Pacific operating margin increased to 1.60% in the second quarter of 2010 from 1.52% in the second quarter of 2009. Our Latin American operating margin decreased to 1.34% in the second quarter of 2010 from 1.60% in the second quarter of 2009. As discussed above, the overall increase in our operating margin primarily reflects the economies of scale realized from the significant increase in our consolidated and regional net sales, the benefits from our expense-reduction initiatives, and the lack of reorganization charges in the current year quarter, offset partially by a decline in our gross margin. We continuously evaluate and may implement process improvements and other changes in order to enhance profitability over the long-term. Such changes, if any, along with normal seasonal variations in net sales, may cause operating margins to fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

     Other expense, net, consisted primarily of interest expense and income, foreign currency exchange gains and losses and other non-operating gains and losses. We incurred other expenses of $9,853 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $6,745 in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting higher net interest costs from lower net cash levels in the second quarter of 2010. The reduction in net cash levels reflects the use of cash to acquire shares under our share repurchase programs and investment in working capital to support the significant growth in revenues.

     The provision for income taxes was $26,996, or an effective tax rate of 28.5%, in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $8,904, or an effective tax rate of 26.0%, in the second quarter of 2009. The year-over-year increase in the effective tax rate primarily reflects the change in mix of profit among different tax jurisdictions.

Results of Operations for the Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 3, 2010 Compared to the Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 4, 2009

     Our consolidated net sales increased 22.0% to $16,252,282 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010, or first six months of 2010, from $13,323,682 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009, or first six months of 2009. Net sales from our North American operations increased 24.2% to $6,850,775 in the first six months of 2010 from $5,516,621 in the first six months of 2009. Net sales from our EMEA operations increased 17.7% to $5,036,915 in the first six months of 2010 from $4,277,774 in the first six months of 2009. Net sales from our Asia Pacific operations increased 25.9% to $3,634,540 in the first six months of 2010 from $2,885,824 in the first six months of 2009. Net sales from our Latin American operations increased 13.5% to $730,052 in the first six months of 2010 from $643,463 in the first six months of 2009. The translation impact of strengthening EMEA, Asia Pacific and Latin American currencies relative to the U.S. dollar contributed approximately one, eleven and nine percentage points of the year-over-year increase in the respective region’s net sales. The combined translation impacts of these foreign currencies contributed approximately three percentage points of the year-over-year increase in our consolidated net sales. Beyond these currency impacts, the increases in consolidated and regional net sales were primarily attributable to the same factors discussed above for the second quarter of 2010 compared to 2009.

     Gross margin declined 35 basis points to 5.41% in the first six months of 2010 compared to 5.76% in the first six months of 2009. The current period decline in gross margin was driven primarily by our strategic decision to use gross margin as one component of our efforts to drive sales growth and thereby generate higher operating leverage, as well as a greater mix of lower-margin products and geographies and softer volumes in our fee-for-service logistics business.

     Total SG&A expenses increased 1.6% to $669,008 in the first six months of 2010 from $658,260 in the first six months of 2009, but improved by 82 basis points, as percentage of consolidated net sales, to 4.12% in the first six months of 2010 from 4.94% in the first six months of 2009. The year-over-year increase in SG&A dollars was mostly due to incremental variable costs on the higher sales volume, additional expenses of $6,000 resulting from our acquired businesses, and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $3,207 associated with our long-term incentive plans, partially offset by savings from our expense-reduction initiatives implemented since the second half of 2008, savings of approximately $9,000 from our exit of the broad line distribution business in EMEA’s Nordic region during the second quarter of 2009 and a benefit of $2,380 related to the gain on the sale of land and a building in EMEA. The translation impacts of foreign currencies contributed approximately two percentage points to the year-over-year increase in our SG&A expenses. The modest increase in SG&A dollars, while significantly out growing revenues, generated the 82 basis point year-over-year reduction in SG&A as a percentage of net sales.

     In the first six months of 2009, we incurred reorganization costs of $20,120, or 15 basis points of consolidated net sales, associated with various actions as part of our cost reduction initiatives in each of our regions as follows: $10,324 or 19 basis points of regional net sales in North America, $7,294 or 17 basis points of regional net sales in

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

EMEA, $2,266 or eight basis points of regional net sales in Asia Pacific, and $236 or four basis points of regional net sales in Latin America. In connection with these actions, we also incurred $1,457, or one basis point of consolidated net sales, ($1,146, or two basis points of North America net sales, and $311, or one basis point of EMEA net sales) in program costs such as retention costs and consulting expenses, which are recorded in SG&A expenses (see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements).

     As discussed in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements, in the first six months of 2009, we recorded a charge of $2,490, or two basis points of consolidated net sales (nine basis points of Asia Pacific net sales), for the impairment of goodwill related to the 2009 acquisitions of VAD and Vantex in Asia Pacific.

     Operating margin increased to 1.29% in the first six months of 2010 from 0.65% in the first six months of 2009. Our operating margin for first six months of 2010 included a benefit from the gain on the sale of a property in EMEA, which was one basis point of our consolidated net sales, while our 2009 operating margin included reorganization and program costs totaling 16 basis points of our consolidated net sales, as well as a charge for goodwill impairment of two basis points of our consolidated net sales in the first six months of 2009, as discussed above. Our North American operating margin increased to 1.41% in the first six months of 2010 from 0.40% in the first six months of 2009. Our EMEA operating margin increased to 1.13% in the first six months of 2010 from 0.59% in the first six months of 2009. Our Asia Pacific operating margin increased to 1.55% in the first six months of 2010 from 1.27% in the first six months of 2009. Our Latin American operating margin decreased to 1.54% in the first six months of 2010 from 1.59% in the first six months of 2009. The overall improvements in our operating margins are primarily attributable to the same factors as discussed in our quarterly operating margins above.

     Other expense, net, consisted primarily of interest expense and income, foreign currency exchange gains and losses and other non-operating gains and losses. We incurred net other expense of $18,310 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $14,366 in the first six months of 2009. The increase in other expenses is primarily attributable to higher net interest costs from lower net cash levels in the first six months of 2010. The lower net cash levels are attributable to the same factors discussed above for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009.

     The provision for income taxes was $53,900, or an effective tax rate of 28.1%, in the first six months of 2010 compared to $19,063, or an effective tax rate of 26.5%, in the first six months of 2009. The year-over-year change in the effective tax rate is primarily a function of shifts in the profit mix across geographies and resolution of minor discrete tax items.

Quarterly Data; Seasonality

     Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future as a result of:

•		general changes in economic or geopolitical conditions, including changes in legislation or regulatory environments in which we operate;
•		competitive conditions in our industry, which may impact the prices charged and terms and conditions imposed by our suppliers and/or competitors and the prices we charge our customers, which in turn may negatively impact our revenues and/or gross margins;
•		seasonal variations in the demand for our products and services, which historically have included lower demand in Europe during the summer months, worldwide pre-holiday stocking in the retail channel during the September-to-December period and the seasonal increase in demand for our North American fee-based logistics services in the fourth quarter, which affects our operating expenses and gross margins;
•		changes in product mix, including entry or expansion into new markets, as well as the exit or retraction of certain business;
•		the impact of and possible disruption caused by reorganization actions and efforts to improve our IT capabilities, as well as the related expenses and/or charges;
•		currency fluctuations in countries in which we operate;
•		variations in our levels of excess inventory and doubtful accounts, and changes in the terms of vendor-sponsored programs such as price protection and return rights;
•		changes in the level of our operating expenses;
•		the impact of acquisitions and divestitures;
•		the occurrence of unexpected events or the resolution of existing uncertainties, including, but not limited to, litigation, regulatory matters, or uncertain tax positions;
•		the loss or consolidation of one or more of our major suppliers or customers;
•		product supply constraints; and
•		interest rate fluctuations and/or credit market volatility, which may increase our borrowing costs and may influence the willingness or ability of customers and end-users to purchase products and services.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

     Historical variations in our business may not be indicative of future trends. In addition, our narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of the foregoing factors on our operating results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

     We finance our working capital needs and investments in the business largely through net income before noncash items, available cash, trade and supplier credit, and borrowings under debt instruments, including our revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing programs, our senior unsecured term loan, revolving credit and other facilities. As a distributor, our business requires significant investment in working capital, particularly trade accounts receivable and inventory, partially financed by vendor trade accounts payable. As a general rule, when sales volumes increase, our net investment in working capital increases, which generally results in decreases in cash flows generated from operating activities. Conversely, when sales volumes are decreasing, our net investment in working capital dollars typically declines, which generally results in increased cash flow generated from operating activities. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $761,849 and $910,936 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively. The decrease in our cash balance during the first six months of 2010 is primarily a function of our investments in the business in the form of working capital and property and equipment, and our repurchases of Class A Common Stock, offset partially by our improved generation of profits from the business, excluding noncash items. The following is a detailed discussion of our cash flows for the first six months of 2010 and 2009.

     Our cash flows provided by operating activities were $91,048 for the first six months of 2010 compared to $700,594 for the first six months of 2009. Our income generation in the first six months of 2010 was stronger than in the first six months of 2009. However, much of the cash generation from that income was strategically invested in working capital during the current year to reflect the higher volume of business as well as to leverage the overall strength of our balance sheet to grow sales and market share. This resulted in a higher level of working capital days, closer to the midpoint of our targeted range, during the first six months of 2010 when compared with the end of 2009. Our collections of trade accounts receivable from the end of 2009 were more than offset by payments of our accounts payable balance from the end of the year and our investment in inventory, which reflected targeted higher stocking levels to facilitate sales anticipated during the second half of the year. Conversely, the significant cash inflow in the first six months of 2009 was driven by a precipitous decline in sales volumes from the end of 2008 and the resultant decrease in our investments in working capital. We also saw a decrease in the level of working capital days over the course of the first six months of the prior year, which reflected a scale-back on working capital investment in light of a much more uncertain economy.

     We may continue to evaluate the strategic use of working capital, such as additional early pay discounts on trade accounts payable or purchase discounts on inventory, the level of inventory we may carry, or the extension of payment terms or larger credit lines to certain customers, as we evaluate the appropriate mix of working capital to drive our business. While each of these factors may yield net additional investment in working capital, as well as sales growth and/or improved profitability, we also continue to manage the risks associated with these strategies and the maximization of our resulting returns on invested capital.

     Net cash used by investing activities was $35,012 for the first six months of 2010 compared to $51,459 for the first six months of 2009. The net cash used by investing activities in the first six months of 2010 was primarily due to capital expenditures and the acquisitions of Albora and Asiasoft, which was partially offset by cash proceeds of $3,924 from our sale of land and building in EMEA. The net cash used by investing activities in the first six months of 2009 was primarily due to capital expenditures and the acquisitions of VAD and Vantex.

     Net cash used by financing activities was $167,921 for the first six months of 2010 compared to $113,947 for the first six months of 2009. The net cash used by financing activities in the first six months of 2010 primarily reflects our repurchase of $152,285 of Class A Common Stock and the net repayments of $29,904 on our revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loan, partially offset by $12,654 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The net cash used by financing activities in the first six months of 2009 primarily reflects the net repayment of $135,930 for our revolving credit facilities, partially offset by $19,623 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

     Our levels of debt and cash and cash equivalents are highly influenced by our working capital needs. As such, our cash and cash equivalents balances and borrowings fluctuate from period-to-period and may also fluctuate significantly within a quarter. The fluctuation is the result of the concentration of payments received from customers toward the end of each month, as well as the timing of payments made to our vendors. Accordingly, our period-end debt and cash balances may not be reflective of our average levels or maximum debt and/or minimum cash levels during the periods presented or at any point in time.

Capital Resources

     We have maintained a conservative capital structure which we believe will continue to serve us well in an economic environment that, while appearing to be in a state of recovery, remains somewhat volatile. We have a range of financing facilities which are diversified by type, maturity and geographic region with various financial institutions worldwide. These facilities have staggered maturities through 2014. A significant portion of our cash and cash equivalents balance at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 resides in our operations outside of the U.S. and are deposited and/or invested with various financial institutions globally that we endeavor to monitor regularly for credit quality. However, we are exposed to risk of loss on funds deposited with the various financial institutions and money market mutual funds and we may experience significant disruptions in our liquidity needs if one or more of these financial institutions were to suffer bankruptcy or similar restructuring. We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash resources and cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with funds available under our credit arrangements, provide sufficient resources to meet our present and future capital requirements, including the potential need to post cash collateral for identified contingencies (see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements and Item 1. “Legal Proceedings” under Part II “Other Information”) for at least the next twelve months. Nevertheless, depending on capital and credit market conditions, we may from time to time seek to increase our available capital resources through additional debt or other financing facilities. Finally, since the capital and credit markets can be volatile, we may be limited in our ability to replace in a timely manner maturing credit facilities on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or to access committed capacities due to the inability of our finance partners to meet their commitments to us.

     In April 2010, we terminated our revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in North America, which provided for up to $600,000 in borrowing capacity secured by substantially all U.S.-based receivables, in conjunction with the execution in the same month of a new revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program secured by a majority of our U.S.-based receivables. This new program initially provides for up to $500,000 in borrowing capacity, and may, subject to the financial institutions’ approval and availability of eligible receivables, be increased to $700,000 in accordance with the terms of the program. The interest rate of this new program is dependent on designated commercial paper rates (or, in certain circumstances, an alternate rate) plus a predetermined margin. The new program matures in April 2013. We had no borrowings at July 3, 2010 under this new North America financing program and we had no borrowings under the terminated facility at January 2, 2010.

     In January 2010, we entered into a new revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in EMEA, which provides for a borrowing capacity of up to Euro 100 million, or approximately $126,000, at July 3, 2010 and matures in January 2014. This new program replaced our Euro 107 million revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program, which we terminated in December 2009. The new program requires certain commitment fees, and borrowings under this program incur financing costs based on EURIBOR plus a predetermined margin. We had no borrowings at July 3, 2010 under this new EMEA financing program.

     We also had a revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in EMEA, which provided for borrowing capacity of up to Euro 70 million which matured in April 2010 and was not renewed or directly replaced. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facility at January 2, 2010.

     We have two other revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing programs in EMEA, which mature in May 2013 and respectively provide for a maximum borrowing capacity of 60 million British pounds, or approximately $91,000, and Euro 90 million, or approximately $113,000, at July 3, 2010. These programs require certain commitment fees, and borrowings under both programs incur financing costs, based on LIBOR and EURIBOR, respectively, plus a predetermined margin. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under these EMEA financing programs.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

     We have a multi-currency revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in Asia Pacific, which matures in September 2011 and provides borrowing capacity of up to 210 million Australian dollars, or approximately $177,000, at July 3, 2010. The interest rate is dependent upon the currency in which the drawing is made and is related to the local short-term bank indicator rate for such currency plus a predetermined margin. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, we had borrowings of $15,487 and $57,526, respectively, under this Asia Pacific financing program.

     Our ability to access financing under all our trade accounts receivable-backed financing programs in North America, EMEA and Asia Pacific, as discussed above, is dependent upon the level of eligible trade accounts receivable as well as continued covenant compliance. We may lose access to all or part of our financing under these programs under certain circumstances, including: (a) a reduction in sales volumes leading to related lower levels of eligible trade accounts receivable; (b) failure to meet certain defined eligibility criteria for the trade accounts receivable, such as receivables remaining assignable and free of liens and dispute or set-off rights; (c) performance of our trade accounts receivable; and/or (d) loss of credit insurance coverage. At July 3, 2010, our actual aggregate available capacity under these programs was approximately $1,007,000 based on eligible trade accounts receivable available, against which we had $15,487 of borrowings. Even if we do not borrow, or choose not to borrow to the full available capacity of certain programs, most of our trade accounts receivable-backed financing programs prohibit us from assigning, transferring or pledging the underlying eligible receivables as collateral for other financing programs. At July 3, 2010, the amount of trade accounts receivable which would be restricted in this regard totaled approximately $1,156,000.

     We have a senior unsecured term loan facility with a bank syndicate. The interest rate on this facility is based on one-month LIBOR, plus a variable margin that is based on our debt ratings and leverage ratio. Interest is payable monthly. Under the terms of the agreement, we are also required to pay a minimum of $3,125 of principal on the loan on a quarterly basis and a balloon payment of $215,625 at the end of the loan term in August 2012. The agreement also contains certain negative covenants, including restrictions on funded debt and interest coverage, as well as customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default.

     In connection with the senior unsecured term loan facility, we have an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $190,625 of the term loan principal amount, the effect of which is to swap the LIBOR portion of the floating-rate obligation for a fixed-rate obligation. The fixed rate including the variable margin is approximately 5%. The notional amount on the interest rate swap agreement reduces by $3,125 quarterly consistent with the amortization schedule of the senior unsecured term loan. We account for the interest rate swap agreement as a cash flow hedge. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, the mark-to-market value of the interest rate swap amounted to $10,706 and $9,662, respectively, which was recorded as a decrease in other comprehensive income with an offsetting increase to the hedged debt, bringing the total carrying value of the senior unsecured term loan to $251,331 and $256,537, respectively.

     We have a $275,000 revolving senior unsecured credit facility with a bank syndicate in North America, which matures in August 2012. The interest rate on the revolving senior unsecured credit facility is based on LIBOR, plus a predetermined margin that is based on our debt ratings and leverage ratio. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, we had no borrowings under this North American credit facility. This credit facility may also be used to issue letters of credit. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, letters of credit of $5,000 for both dates were issued to certain vendors and financial institutions to support purchases by our subsidiaries, payment of insurance premiums and flooring arrangements. Our available capacity under the agreement is reduced by the amount of any issued and outstanding letters of credit.

     We have a 20 million Australian dollar, or approximately $17,000, at July 3, 2010, senior unsecured credit facility that matures in December 2011. The interest rate on this credit facility is based on Australian or New Zealand short-term bank indicator rates, depending on the funding currency, plus a predetermined margin that is based on our debt ratings and our leverage ratio. We had no borrowings outstanding at July 3, 2010 and had $861 outstanding at January 2, 2010 under this Asia Pacific facility.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Continued

     We also have additional lines of credit, short-term overdraft facilities and other credit facilities with various financial institutions worldwide, which provide for borrowing capacity aggregating approximately $598,000 at July 3, 2010. Most of these arrangements are on an uncommitted basis and are reviewed periodically for renewal. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, we had $84,346 and $64,571, respectively, outstanding under these facilities. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under these facilities, which may fluctuate depending on geographic mix, was 6.5% and 5.1% per annum, respectively, at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010. At July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, letters of credit totaling $18,757 and $22,112, respectively, were issued principally to certain vendors to support purchases by our subsidiaries. The issuance of these letters of credit reduces our available capacity under these agreements by the same amount.

     Except for the termination of our $600,000 North American revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program in April 2010 and its concurrent replacement with a $500,000 revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program and the termination of our Euro 70 million EMEA revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing program, there have been no other significant changes in our contractual obligations from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010.

Covenant Compliance

     We are required to comply with certain financial covenants under the terms of some of our financing facilities, including restrictions on funded debt and liens and covenants related to tangible net worth, leverage and interest coverage ratios and trade accounts receivable portfolio performance including metrics related to receivables and payables. We are also restricted by other covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the amount of additional indebtedness we can incur, dividends we can pay, and the amount of common stock that we can repurchase annually. At July 3, 2010, we were in compliance with all material covenants or other material requirements set forth in our trade accounts receivable-backed programs and credit agreements or other agreements with our creditors as discussed above.

Other Matters

     See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements and Item 1. “Legal Proceedings” under Part II “Other Information” for discussion of other matters.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     There were no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010. For further discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     Our management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     Unless otherwise indicated, amounts are stated in thousands of U.S. dollars.

     Our Brazilian subsidiary has been assessed for commercial taxes on its purchases of imported software for the period January to September 2002. The principal amount of the tax assessed for this period was 12.7 million Brazilian reais. Although we believe we have valid defenses to the payment of the assessed taxes, as well as any amounts due for the unassessed period from October 2002 to December 2005, after consultation with counsel and consideration of legislation enacted in February 2007, it is our opinion that it is probable that we may be required to pay all or some of these taxes. Accordingly, we recorded a net charge to cost of sales of $30,134 in 2007 to establish a liability for these taxes assessable through December 2005. The legislation enacted in February 2007 provides that such taxes are not assessable on software imports after January 1, 2006. In the fourth quarters of 2009 and 2008, we released a portion of this commercial tax reserve amounting to $9,758 and $8,224, respectively, (17.1 million and 19.6 million Brazilian reais at a December 2009 exchange rate of 1.741 and December 2008 exchange rate of 2.330 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar, respectively). These partial reserve releases were related to the unassessed periods from January through December 2004 and January through December 2003, respectively, for which it is our opinion, after consultation with counsel, that the statute of limitations for an assessment from Brazilian tax authorities has expired. The remaining amount of liability at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 was 28.2 million Brazilian reais (approximately $15,800 and $16,200 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively, based on the exchange rate prevailing on those dates of 1.779 and 1.741 Brazilian reais, respectively, to the U.S. dollar).

     While the tax authorities may seek to impose interest and penalties in addition to the tax as discussed above, we continue to believe that we have valid defenses to the assessment of interest and penalties, which as of July 3, 2010 potentially amount to approximately $13,500 and $11,900, respectively, based on the exchange rate prevailing on that date of 1.779 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar. Therefore, we have not established an additional reserve for interest and penalties as we have determined that an unfavorable outcome with respect to interest and penalties is currently not probable. We will continue to vigorously pursue administrative and judicial action to challenge the current, and any subsequent assessments. However, we can make no assurances that we will ultimately be successful in defending any such assessments, if made.

     In 2007, the Sao Paulo Municipal Tax Authorities assessed our Brazilian subsidiary a commercial service tax based upon our sale of software. The assessment for taxes and penalties covers the years 2002 through 2006 and totaled 55.1 million Brazilian reais or approximately $31,000 based upon a July 3, 2010 exchange rate of 1.779 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar. Although not included in the original assessment, additional potential liability arising from this assessment for interest and adjustment for inflation totaled 75.8 million Brazilian reais or approximately $42,600 at July 3, 2010. The authorities could make further tax assessments for the period after 2006, which may be material. It is our opinion, after consulting with counsel, that our subsidiary has valid defenses against the assessment of these taxes, penalties, interest, or any additional assessments related to this matter, and we therefore have not recorded a charge for the assessment as an unfavorable outcome is not probable. After seeking relief in administrative proceedings, we are now vigorously pursuing judicial action to challenge the current assessment and any subsequent assessments, which may require us to post collateral or provide a guarantee equal to or greater than the total amount of the assessment, penalties and interest, adjusted for inflation factors. In addition, we can make no assurances that we will ultimately be successful in our defense of this matter.

     We and one of our subsidiaries were named as defendants in two separate lawsuits arising out of the bankruptcy of Refco, Inc., and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Refco”). In August 2007, the trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust filed suit against Grant Thornton LLP, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, Phillip Bennett, and numerous other individuals and entities (the “Kirschner action”), claiming damage to the bankrupt Refco entities in the amount of $2 billion. Of its forty-four claims for relief, the Kirschner action contains a single claim against us and our subsidiary, alleging that loan transactions between the subsidiary and Refco in early 2000 and early 2001 aided and abetted the common law fraud of Bennett and other defendants, resulting in damage to Refco in August 2004 when it effected a leveraged buyout in which it incurred substantial new debt while distributing assets to Refco insiders. In March 2008, the liquidators of numerous Cayman Island-based hedge funds filed suit (the “Krys action”) against many of the same defendants named in the Kirschner action, as well as others. The Krys action alleges that we and our subsidiary aided and abetted the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty of Refco insiders and others by participating in the above loan transactions, causing damage to the hedge funds in an unspecified amount. Both actions were removed by the defendants to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In April 2009, the trial court in the Kirschner action granted our motion to dismiss, and ordered that judgment be entered in favor of the Company and our subsidiary. That judgment has been appealed by the plaintiff. On March 31, 2010, the district court partially granted, without prejudice, our motion to dismiss in the Krys matter on standing grounds. Our motion to dismiss is still pending with respect to other grounds for dismissal. We intend to continue vigorously defending these cases and do not expect the final disposition of either to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 5. Other Information

     Share Repurchase Programs:

     In November 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program, allowing us to purchase up to $300,000 of our outstanding shares of common stock, over a three-year period. During the second quarter of 2010, we purchased 3,038,000 shares of our common stock under this program for an aggregate cost of $52,285. The following table provides information about our monthly share repurchase activity under this program during the quarter:

Approximate

Dollar Value

Total Number

of Shares that

of Shares

May Yet Be

Total Number

Average

Purchased as

Purchased

of Shares

Price Paid

Part of Publicly

Under the

Fiscal Month Period

Purchased

Per Share

Announced Program

Program ($000s)

May 1 – May 29, 2010

3,024,000

$

17.21

18,332,000

$

236

May 30 – July 3, 2010

14,000

16.73

18,346,000

0

     In May 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a one-year $100,000 share repurchase program, following the completion of our $300,000 repurchase program as discussed above.

     We completed the additional program during the quarter with the repurchase of 5,922,000 shares of our common stock as shown in the table below:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Approximate

Dollar Value

Total Number

of Shares that

of Shares

May Yet Be

Total Number

Average

Purchased as

Purchased

of Shares

Price Paid

Part of Publicly

Under the

Fiscal Month Period

Purchased

Per Share

Announced Program

Program ($000s)

May 30 – July 3, 2010

5,922,000

$

16.89

5,922,000

$

0

     We repurchased shares under both of these programs through open market transactions. The repurchases were funded with cash and available borrowing capacity.

Item 6. Exhibits

No.		Description
31.1		Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”)
31.2		Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of SOX
32.1		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of SOX

Signatures

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

August 10, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX

No.		Description
31.1		Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”)
31.2		Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of SOX
32.1		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of SOX

Exhibit 31.1

Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gregory M.E. Spierkel, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ingram Micro Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	(a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2010

Exhibit 31.2

Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William D. Humes, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ingram Micro Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	(a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2010

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Ingram Micro Inc. (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Gregory M.E. Spierkel, the Chief Executive Officer and William D. Humes, the Chief Financial Officer of Ingram Micro Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
2.		The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ingram Micro Inc.

Date: August 10, 2010